Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Paying for the News: Five Seeds for the Future of Journalism
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

E-Media Tidbits

Home > E-Media Tidbits
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Amy Gahran
A group weblog by the sharpest minds in online media
PoynterGroups.
Find and join conversations about E-Media Tidbits or Online & Multimedia.


Are Blogs "Riskier" Sources?
Posted by Amy Gahran 4:44 PM

My earlier post requesting your input on whether and how news organizations should use bloggers as sources sparked some intriguing discussion in the comments.

So far, the consensus appears to be that blogs can be good sources of leads, quotes, or angles, but specific quotes or claims should be verified directly via conventional journalistic practice. I think that's sound -- and not just for quoting blogs, but for quoting anything or anyone.

Matt Ridings noted a concern I've heard from many journalists: "There is nothing stopping the blogger from editing the piece that you just used as a source, or in fact changing the viewpoint or context completely. This goes for online comments to that blog as well. ...An op-ed piece in the newspaper will at least still be the same piece a month from now, regardless of whether the author has had a change of heart. Not so with a blog."

While it's true that blogs are easily editable (an issue I've explored recently in my weblog Contentious), post-publication revisions are by no means limited to weblogs.

Many news organizations routinely update online stories as new information comes to light. While updates are generally beneficial, they can potentially eliminate information which others might wish to quote.

Similarly, some organizations or government agencies will delete or revise problematic or controversialline statements or information after initial publication. Actually, I see revisions happening far more often on official corporate or government sites (often following media or blog coverage) than on blogs or news sites. This is one of many reasons why I always save a copy of anything I might want to quote or use in Furl.

The bottom line: Blogs are one of many source options, and no two blogs are completely alike. Each must be judged on its own merits -- just like with any source of information. Credulously quoting a blog is no greater sin than credulously quoting a press release, unverified document, or reader tip. Keep your journalist hat on and you might find some blogs that can become trusted sources.

Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Recent Comments:
Know your sources Much of the debate about the relationship between blogs and... More.
Read All Comments (1 comments)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers