|
journalismenterprise.com
This U.K. unconference was a "perfect brainstorm" of entrepreneurial ideas for journalism. |
What happens when you bring together local journalists, bloggers, Web publishers, online journalism experts, and new media startups -- and get them talking?
That was the question that JEEcamp sought to answer on Mar. 14 in the U.K. (Disclosure: I was one of the organizers of this event.) This "unconference" on journalism enterprise and entrepreneurship tackled some of the big questions facing news in 2008:
- How do you make money from news when information is free?
- Where is the funding for news startups?
- How do you generate community?
- What models work for news online?
Half the attendees represented the people behind the mainstream media's attempts to get to grips with the Web -- the hyperlocal sites of the Teesside Gazette, the mapping and crowdsourcing of the Manchester Evening News, the blogs of the Birmingham Post.
The other half represented what is clear is an emerging cottage journalism industry: niche news sites, local blogs, citizen journalism, and news prediction services.
Rick Waghorn's keynote speech on his experience establishing and expanding MyFootBallWriter set things going perfectly. In particular, his negative experiences of Google AdSense found a very receptive audience -- despite 400,000 page impressions over the summer, he said, his AdSense revenues were only $180. Meanwhile, in seven years the most popular Harry Potter site has earned only $6,500 from the scheme. Following proceedings online, Graham Holliday added: "Bang on on Adsense -- I do around 50,000 per month and make $100-150 off of it."
The verdict from Rick: "Clearly if anybody is going to earn a living, it cannot be through Google Ads."
Instead, Rick explained his own business model: a combination of old-fashioned local ad sales, a self-built ad service (Addiply), affiliate sales; and syndication to those big publishers looking to add more local coverage to their global brands.
This was an unconference, so after Rick's speech the emphasis was on discussion and exchanging experiences. The group discussing community spoke of the problem of users' "sporadic involvement", of journalists not connecting with people online, technological barriers to instant publishing, and the need for journalists to become brands. There was an anecdote about bloggers recruited by the Birmingham Post "scooping" the paper by scheduling embargoed news to go live the minute the embargo was lifted. (Not that the journalist concerned felt this was a bad thing.)
The group discussing business models scratched their heads at the possibility of OhMyNews' tip jar model working elsewhere, and why it didn't make a profit from ads and syndication. They also pondered whether big publishers should buy startups and the problems of aggregation. Martin Stabe argued that the only aggregators with any chance of success are those that add value, such as geotagging.
The funding group talked of the importance of five year financial forecasts, how to approach Web-ignorant banks, why there was a need for a British equivalent of the Knight Foundation, and how angel investors want to see a big existing market because the risks of complete failure are lower.
The online news models group discussed how journalism is not just about reporting, but networking; the importance of interaction on every level rather than just forums; and the need to get out alerts while ensuring accuracy.
The event was covered live by a team of journalism degree students using CoverItLive at JournalismEnterprise.com, which enabled people to contribute to the discussion -- and create discussions of their own -- online.
In addition there was a JEEcamp aggregator that pulled together blog posts, images, video, bookmarks and tweets following the event, and a Twitter aggregator pulling together tweets from attendees. Video of the event should appear on the European Journalism Centre site.
The day ended with a panel discussion of some of the emerging issues. As I looked out at the people gathered it occurred to me that in 10 years, half would probably be buying out the other half.
The question is, which half will be which?
