By Donna Shaw
American Journalism ReviewPublished: 2/01/2006
Excerpt:
When Robert Lutner saw on the
news that two close friends, Brenda Groene and her boyfriend, Mark
McKenzie, had been bound and bludgeoned to death along with Groene's
13-year-old son, Slade, he broke down and wept... Who could have done such a thing? And where were two other
Groene children — Shasta, 8, and Dylan, 9 — both reported missing?
Lutner, who had been at Groene's Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, home on
May 15, 2005, the day before the bodies were found, called the hotline
set up by the local sheriff to offer any information he could. He says
no one called him back...
Shocked and emotionally drained ...he went home and did something he
knew he shouldn't: He got drunk. Lutner, 33, is on probation for
unemployment fraud and is forbidden to drink. So when his probation
officer called that evening and said he needed to see him immediately,
Lutner ignored him and turned off his phone.
"The next thing I know, I turn on the TV and see that I'm a
'person of interest,'" says Lutner, a concrete worker and father of
two. "It was like I was in a dream world."
Kelly McBride, ethics group leader at the Poynter Institute and a
former Spokesman-Review staffer, says that given the grisly facts of
the Groene crimes, this "might be one of the cases that passes the
extenuating-circumstances test." With three people dead and two
children missing, it made sense for reporters to use the information on
Lutner, says McBride, who used to live in Coeur D'Alene.
At the same time, she says, reporters need to make sure they
are using "person of interest" with some context, keeping in mind that
police and journalists "have a different mission and purpose and set of
obligations..."
More of this article...
Search Google News for more quotes by Kelly McBride...