February 14, 2024

Messenger founder and CEO Jimmy Finkelstein defended the company’s business model in an interview with Axios Tuesday, claiming that the outlet would have been profitable by August if it had remained open.

The Messenger closed in January, less than a year after it launched with $50 million in funding and more than 175 journalists. Finkelstein, who previously owned The Hill, had big ambitions for the online, centrist startup; he planned to grow the newsroom to 550 people, generate more than $100 million in revenue and reach 100 million monthly readers.

Many media watchers had doubts about The Messenger’s business model — which was predicated on advertising — from the start. On Jan. 31, the company abruptly laid off its 300-person staff without severance and closed its website after Finkelstein failed to raise enough money to keep the company open.

“I have absolute confidence that by August, we would have been profitable,” Finkelstein told Axios. “If we raised the $20 million, we would have been absolutely profitable. So I think that our model — which everybody decided on their own was an old model, it’s just not their model — was working.”

Finkelstein said The Messenger saw traffic grow significantly in January, and he had projected $60 million in revenue and three to four hundred million pageviews for 2024. But he said poor economic conditions and bad press limited his ability to find investors. The Messenger was also hindered by a six-month delay in launching its website. During that time, the company spent $20 million.

Before its closure, several Messenger executives took pay cuts, Finkelstein said. He himself took a 50% cut. Asked why he didn’t close the site earlier so that he could pay out severance to employees, Finkelstein told Axios that he thought he could work out a deal to keep the site open. He came close to selling The Messenger to the Los Angeles Times — which has also been experiencing financial issues and layoffs — but the deal fell apart at the last minute.

After Axios suggested that he use some of his multimillion-dollar fortune to pay out employees’ severance, Finkelstein said, “I put a lot of money into this site at the end to keep it going.” He added, “There are some things I might consider doing,” but did not offer more details.

The Messenger currently faces a lawsuit from former employees, who allege the company violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act by failing to provide advance notice of the layoffs. About the suit, Finkelstein said, “We are not concerned about that.”

Finkelstein said he is considering reopening The Messenger’s website but did not provide a timeline. After the layoffs, some former journalists complained that they could not access their work to use as clips when applying for new jobs. Finkelstein told Axios that he gave employees passwords to access their content last week.

By Angela Fu, media business reporter

‘Immense change’ is coming to CNN

Big shifts are coming to CNN, according to a post on X from Washington Post media reporter Jeremy Barr.

“Immense change is coming, and I don’t use that lightly,” CNN CEO Mark Thompson reportedly said at an all-bureau CNN meeting in London on Tuesday.

In a year that has already seen numerous layoffs, closures and cuts — at the Los Angeles Times, Business Insider, Condé Nast, National Geographic, NBC News and The Messenger — “immense change” sounds ominous.

CNN last completed a round of layoffs in December 2022, impacting “a couple hundred” employees, including big names such as political analyst Chris Cillizza.

And, last month, Thompson wrote a memo to staff outlining his vision for the cable network to embrace a “true multimedia strategy” to combine all of CNN’s news operations under one umbrella.

We’ll have to wait and see what “immense change” means for CNN. (We know it won’t be a morning show.)

By Annie Aguiar, audience engagement producer

Here’s Jonny!

Jon Stewart is back in his chair as host of “The Daily Show.” Did he ever leave?

He “wasn’t sitting at his desk at Comedy Central for the last nine years, waiting for someone to turn the lights back on. Yet it almost felt that way …” Associated Press media writer David Bauder wrote.

“The GOAT of late night satire is back,” NPR TV critic Eric Deggans wrote.

Stewart opened Monday’s debut show with a 20-minute skewering of Donald Trump and Joe Biden and their struggles to recall details during recent legal battles.

“It turns out, the leading cause of early onset dementia is being deposed,” Stewart joked, pivoting quickly between wisecracks and the trademark sharp criticism that launched him into stardom in his 16-year run as host of the show. He noted that some would say it’s unfair to compare Biden’s gaffes with Trump’s behavior, but that tackling voter concerns is part of the presidential gig. “It’s the candidate’s job to assuage concerns,” he said, “not the voter’s job not to mention them.”

“Public figures are served notice that the media’s sharpest bull detector is back on the job,” Bauder wrote.

Stewart will host Monday episodes of “The Daily Show” until the 2024 presidential election.

Before his departure in 2015, Stewart was a massive ratings draw. He inspired an entire genre of crisp, late-night political commentary. Will his return performance do the same?

“With luck, Stewart’s appeal to The Daily Show’s old school fans will bring better ratings on (Comedy Central), but it’s still likely to be a smaller crowd than he once commanded,” Deggans wrote. “Regardless, last night’s program shows Stewart’s still got the comedy chops and incisive ideas to power the show at least through the presidential election in November.”

By Ren LaForme, managing editor

A bold election prediction: Biden wins!

Even before the well-meaning-forgetful-elderly-man stuff, Democrats and left-leaning media have been looking gloomily at tea leaves suggesting that Donald Trump has Joe Biden outflanked politically. So here is a cheer-up alternative view for them from the economic forecasting unit at Moody’s Analytics: It’ll be a “nail-biter,” but Biden will prevail, says the ratings service’s chief economist, Mark Zandi, and his associates. Rising household income and easing gas prices are among the factors they argue will break in Biden’s favor.

By Rick Edmonds, media business analyst

Media tidbits and links

More resources for journalists

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org.

The Poynter Report is our daily media newsletter. To have it delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, sign up here.

Support high-integrity, independent journalism that serves democracy. Make a gift to Poynter today. The Poynter Institute is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, and your gift helps us make good journalism better.
Donate
Angela Fu is a reporter for Poynter. She can be reached at afu@poynter.org or on Twitter @angelanfu.
Angela Fu
Annie Aguiar is an audience engagement producer for Poynter’s newsroom. She was previously a state issues reporter for the Lansing State Journal and graduated from…
Annie Aguiar
Ren LaForme is the Managing Editor of Poynter.org. He was previously Poynter's digital tools reporter, chronicling tools and technology for journalists, and a producer for…
Ren LaForme
Rick Edmonds is media business analyst for the Poynter Institute where he has done research and writing for the last fifteen years. His commentary on…
Rick Edmonds

More News

Back to News