Every once in a while the question about moderated and unmoderated discussion forums on news sites pops up. What if people misbehave? And how can guidelines be established so they are followed? The London Free Press of Canada describes two recent libel cases that have the courts sending clear messages that defamation on the Internet is no different than defamation in print — and hence can be very costly. Maybe a good dose of reminding readers that e-mails and discussion forum posts will never go away — and can always be traced back to the originator — mixed with a couple of successful libel cases will be enough to help readers keep discussions civilized.
Uncategorized
Internet Defamation and Forum Guidelines
Tags: E-Media Tidbits, WTSP
More News
‘No comment’: When it’s time to make that the story
What an independent journalist and a student newspaper can teach journalists about sources who block them
January 3, 2025
Here’s what Poynter looked like 50 years ago
Orange walls. TVs with bunny ears. Light tables. And so much carpet …
January 2, 2025
When should journalists use the word ‘terrorism?’
The FBI is calling the attack in New Orleans that killed at least 10 an 'act of terrorism.' Here are some considerations for journalists.
January 1, 2025
A journalist reckons with the press’ treatment of baseball Hall of Famer Roberto Clemente
‘Call Me Roberto!,’ a nonfiction picture book, tells the story of the athlete’s struggle to get the media to respect him
December 31, 2024
Opinion | Editor’s choice: 15 of the best Poynter articles from 2024
A retrospective of a cult classic journalism movie. An editor who was fired for talking to us. A tipster’s massive find. What a year it was.
December 30, 2024