What was the biggest lie of 2022?
Think about that for a second.
In today’s world where many politicians, some cable news pundits and millions on social media lie like they breathe, coming up with the lie of the year is a daunting task.
For the past 14 years, Poynter’s PolitFact has taken on the challenge of selecting the lie of the year. And explaining why it’s so important to call it out.
Sadly, the lies are more than just words. They lead to real-life consequences and deadly results. Past lies of the year, as selected by the PolitiFact team, include misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccinations, as well as the lies that led to the fatal Jan. 6 insurrection.
This year’s Lie of the Year has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands.
Published just this morning, the 2022 PolitiFact “Lie of the Year” is Vladimir Putin’s lies about Ukraine.
In their piece for PolitiFact, Deputy Editor Rebecca Catalanello and Senior Correspondent Louis Jacobson wrote that Putin and Russia launched a war against Ukraine that was “built on a foundation of lies.”
Catalanello and Jacobson wrote:
“Putin joined history’s most brutal authoritarians, deploying a well-worn and highly sophisticated propaganda machine to wage an unprovoked war.
More than political rhetoric, spin or occasional lying, this playbook uses coordinated networks — hundreds of websites, state-run media, social media channels, fake fact-checking and oppressive censorship laws — to disseminate ruthless falsehoods. The aim is to justify brutality, blindfold its citizens and persuade potential allies.
Ukraine wasn’t being led by neo-Nazis and it wasn’t committing genocide. Putin employed those lies to co-opt Russian citizens whose family members would be sent to fight a war, kill others and possibly die themselves.
The lies have permeated the assault. When hundreds of bodies were discovered lying in the streets and homes of Bucha after weeks of Russian occupation, horrifying the world and generating global outrage, Putin’s regime claimed the scenes were staged by Ukrainians. That was a lie.
To orchestrate his power and land grab, Putin long denied Ukraine was even a country — falsely characterizing its history and culture, suggesting the Ukranians were simply Russians who needed to be brought back in the fold. So with his war divided families, displaced millions of people, altered the global economy and disrupted the world economy.”
The toll of these lies and this war? Catalanello and Jacobson wrote, “By U.S. estimates, each side has seen 100,000 troops killed or injured. More than 40,000 Ukrainian civilians are dead. Fifteen million people have been driven from their homes.”
On Monday, I reached out to PolitiFact managing editor Katie Sanders to get the lowdown on this year’s choice for “Lie of the Year.” Here’s our conversation:
Tom Jones: I’ll get into this year’s Lie of the Year in a moment, but can you give readers a little behind-the-scenes look? How do you all go about selecting what is the lie of the year? What’s the process like?
Katie Sanders: I started thinking about Lie of the Year back in early October in an effort to take stock of all we covered before the mad dash of the election. I looked through the archives for False and Pants on Fire highlights and made a long list of serious contenders, with an eye for claims that spoke to the year’s most important stories. Claims that are ridiculous but insignificant are not considered for Lie of the Year. I kept updating that list through the election, of course. Then we vetted several ideas with the full team after Election Day on Zoom. Our leadership team made the final call after reviewing the strongest arguments for three finalists.
Jones: You mention the election. How much consideration was given to lies told on the campaign trail, particularly from election deniers?
Sanders: We strongly considered election denialism. I don’t think we have ever fact-checked so many claims from potential secretaries of state as we did this year. We considered choosing election denialism in previous years, too. In 2020, we chose COVID downplay over Trump’s election claims. In 2021, we discussed the impact of the election lie as part of our report on rhetoric downplaying the significance of the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. We’re continuing to watch how this narrative evolves in 2023. Election experts told us the trend was beaten back in the midterms, but it hasn’t disappeared.
Jones: Were there any other lies that received consideration as Lie of the Year?
Sanders: There were good cases to make for each of our reader poll picks, which included election denialism, exaggerations on abortion and conspiracy theories about the attack on Paul Pelosi echoed by Trump. As the year went on, there seemed to be more legs to transphobic claims about schools implementing litter boxes to accommodate students who identify as “furries.” Our readers thought Trump deserved the award for his false whataboutism on Obama’s handling of classified documents. But Putin’s lie about genocide in Ukraine came in second, so I think our readers will understand this choice.
Jones: Ultimately, PolitFact chose Putin’s lies about Ukraine as the Lie of the Year. How did you come to that decision?
Sanders: It came down to consequence — none of the other claims we considered matched the human toll and worldwide fallout from Putin’s war, premised on lies and defended with lies. The story says it best: “Although there’s little revelatory about Putin lying — the former KGB leader is widely understood to be the sponsor of worldwide disinformation efforts and cybermeddling (including in U.S. elections) — the human toll of the invasion of Ukraine is inescapable and horrific. By U.S. estimates, each side has seen 100,000 troops killed or injured. More than 40,000 Ukrainian civilians are dead. Fifteen million people have been driven from their homes.”
Jones: In recent years, PolitiFact’s Lie of the Year included lies about COVID-19 and events that led to the Jan. 6 insurrection. Those lies were told and amplified by not just one entity. This year, however, the lie came mostly from one person — Vladimir Putin. You laid out exactly the things Putin lied about, but did he have any help? Were there those, perhaps in the media or on social media, who helped perpetuate or amplify Putin’s lies about Ukraine?
Sanders: Putin deserves the focus, without a doubt, but you’re right to say he had a lot of help. He uses a sophisticated propaganda machine built on coordinated networks of websites, state-run media and social media accounts, and even fake fact-checking. The country’s harsh censorship laws keep accurate information out of Russian hands and punish dissent. It isn’t just the Russians, though. Our story notes how American pundits amplified disinformation about U.S.-supported biolabs in Ukraine. Fox News host Tucker Carlson focused coverage on whether Ukraine was using the labs to build bioweapons. There’s no evidence this is “totally and completely true,” as he said.
Jones: Finally, what do you hope readers take from PolitiFact’s Lie of the Year?
Sanders: It’s easy to lose sight of the importance of a far-away war as it fades from TV channels and front pages, but Putin’s invasion and the campaign of lies he used to justify it still require our attention. We hope the breadth of claims covered in this story helps readers recognize disinformation from Russia and around the world and why it’s important for us all to call it out, relentlessly.
And now for the rest of today’s newsletter …
Change at the top of the Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal has a new top editor. Emma Tucker, a longtime editor for Rupert Murdoch-owned newspapers in Britain, takes over for Matt Murray, who had been the editor since 2018.
The move is not a surprise. Semafor’s Max Tani reported about a month ago that Tucker would soon take over for Murray. Tucker, currently the editor of The Sunday Times in London, will take over the Journal in February and will become the first female editor of that paper.
Tucker will report to Robert Thomson, chief executive of Murdoch’s News Corp. — the Journal’s parent company. In a statement, Thompson said, “Emma is a brilliant, inspiring editor, with digital nous and the highest standards of integrity. Her global vision and experience will be particularly important at a time of immense international opportunity for The Wall Street Journal.”
The Wall Street Journal’s Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg and Alexandra Bruell wrote, “At the Sunday Times, Ms. Tucker has prioritized audience growth, utilizing analytics and data to inform change in the newsroom, people who have worked with her say. On her watch, digital readership more than doubled, News Corp said. Digital subscriptions at the Times and Sunday Times grew from 320,000 at the end of 2019 to roughly 450,000 as of September 2022. Ms. Tucker’s journalism career started in London at the Financial Times, where she had early stints covering politics and economics. She later held assignments in Brussels and Berlin, and eventually rose to editor of the FT Weekend. She served as deputy editor at the Times of London prior to being named editor of the Sunday Times.”
The Washington Post’s Sarah Ellison wrote, “The move signals a reassertion of control by Murdoch, who bought the Journal in 2007 and quickly took editorial command of the publication. Since then, Murray has been the only top editor to rise through the ranks of the Journal; the others have been British editors brought over from other Murdoch titles.”
What about Murray? He is expected to stay on briefly to help Tucker with the transition before taking a senior position at News Corp, where he will work on new projects and report to Thomson.
The New York Times’ Katie Robertson, Edmund Lee and Benjamin Mullin wrote that Murray replaced Gerald Baker, who had “faced complaints in the newsroom, including accusations by some reporters of going easy on then-President Donald J. Trump.”
The Times added, “Staff morale largely improved under Mr. Murray, whose tenure included the award-winning 2021 Facebook Files series, based on a cache of internal documents, and other impactful work. But he has disagreed with The Journal’s publisher, Almar Latour, over the paper’s direction and how to grow its subscriber base.”
The Times also noted, “The announcement comes as a special committee at News Corp is weighing a possible merger with Fox Corporation, the media company founded by Mr. Murdoch. The deal, if it happens, would unite under one corporate roof Fox News, with its conservative prime-time programming, with The Wall Street Journal, a move that has set off some unease in The Journal’s newsroom.”
The drama continues at ‘GMA3’
“GMA3” co-hosts Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes in May. (Photo by Charles Sykes/Invision/AP)
The Amy Robach-T.J. Holmes soap opera continues. The two co-anchors of ABC News’ “GMA3” show were yanked from the air last week after The Daily Mail reported the two, both married to other people, were having an affair with one another. ABC News president Kim Godwin announced a week ago that while the two did not appear to have violated any company rules, they would remain off the air pending an investigation.
That investigation is continuing and the co-hosts remain sidelined. Godwin sent another note to staff Monday that said, in part, “I understand that the continuing coverage can be distracting from the incredibly important work our team does here at ABC News. Amy and T.J. will remain off-air pending the completion of an internal review, and there will be a rotation of anchors at GMA3 for the time being. It is my hope that we will continue to focus our energy on what we do best, and I want all of you to know how immensely proud I am of your hard work and professionalism.”
Page Six’s Carlos Greer, quoting unnamed sources, writes that ABC News anchors, including lead anchor David Muir, are “upset” with Robach and Holmes and the distraction it has caused at the network.
In an unusual move, an anchor from another network weighed in on the whole thing. Appearing on Bravo’s “Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen,” “CBS Mornings” co-host Gayle King said she hoped to avoid talking about the drama at ABC, but then said, “I look at the situation and I do say it’s very interesting what’s happening over there. It’s just gotten very messy and very sloppy, I do think that. Because in the beginning I actually thought good on ‘Good Morning America,’ they’re saying that they’re not taking them off the air, two consenting adults. But then the more you read, it’s just very messy.”
IFJ counts 67 journalists killed so far in 2022
For this item, I turn it over to my Poynter colleague Amaris Castillo.
Sixty-seven journalists have been killed so far this year while performing their jobs, the International Federation of Journalists reported Friday.
In a press release, the Brussels-based organization described the deaths as a reversal of the decline recorded in recent years. In 2021, the IFJ recorded 47 journalists killed.
“The surge in the killings of journalists and other media workers is a grave cause of concern and yet another wake-up call for governments across the globe to take action in the defense of journalism, one of the key pillars of democracy,” IFJ General Secretary Anthony Bellanger said in a statement. “The failure to act will only embolden those who seek to suppress the free flow of information and undermine the ability of people to hold their leaders to account, including in ensuring that those with power and influence do not stand in the way of open and inclusive societies.”
According to IFJ’s list, of the 21 countries where deadly incidents were recorded, the war in Ukraine accounts for the highest with 12 deaths. The full list, which also includes accidental killings, is available here.
Musk booed
New Twitter boss Elon Musk might think he’s the coolest guy in the world on his new platform, but apparently, he’s not such hot stuff when he goes out into the real world. Comedian Dave Chappelle, another guy who might not always be as funny and clever as he thinks, brought Musk onto the stage in San Francisco on Sunday night. And Musk was booed. Roundly and loudly for several minutes.
There are plenty of reasons to boo Musk these days. Aside from throwing more gas on the dumpster fire that Twitter can be with misinformation and vitriol, Musk spent the weekend causing more of a stir. That included more attacks on Dr. Anthony Fauci, suggesting that Fauci should be prosecuted.
Musk took to Twitter to say that 90% of the audience at the Chappelle show cheered him, while only 10% booed. Those who were there posted videos and claimed it was more like 80% booing.
Troubling Twitter news
This news broke Monday night: Twitter dissolved its Trust and Safety Council. As The Washington Post’s Cat Zakrzewski, Joseph Menn and Naomi Nix noted, “(it’s) the latest sign that Elon Musk is unraveling years of work and institutions created to make the social network safer and more civil.”
CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan wrote that the council, according to a page that no longer exists on Twitter, was “made up of external expert organizations that advised on issues including online safety, human and digital rights, suicide prevention, mental health, child sexual exploitation and dehumanization.”
But on Monday night, council members received an email from Twitter that thanked the council but said it was “reevaluating how best to bring external insights into our product and policy development work. As part of this process, we have decided that the Trust and Safety Council is not the best structure to do this.”
Zakrzewski, Menn and Nix wrote, “In less than two months, Musk has undone years of investments in trust and safety at Twitter — dismissing key parts of the workforce and bringing back accounts that previously had been suspended.”
Media tidbits
- Speaking of Musk, The Atlantic’s Charlie Warzel with “Elon Musk Is a Far-Right Activist.”
- And one more regarding Musk and Twitter: CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan with “Former top Twitter official forced to leave home due to threats amid ‘Twitter Files’ release.”
- The New York Times’ Michael Levenson with “In a Future Filled With Electric Cars, AM Radio May Be Left Behind.”
- For ProPublica, James Bandler with “Inside Google’s Quest to Digitize Troops’ Tissue Samples.”
- Another moving appreciation about soccer writer Grant Wahl, who suddenly died last week while covering the World Cup in Qatar: The Los Angeles Times’ Christian Stone with “There was something Bourdain-like about the big, soccer life Grant Wahl led.”
- Variety’s Brian Steinberg with “Fox Business Plans to Launch Two Daytime Roundtable Shows.”
- Variety’s Daniel D’Addario with “Why ‘The White Lotus’ Was the Best Show of 2022.”
- The Golden Globe nominations came out Monday. Here they are.
Hot type
A major project about the fentanyl crisis from The Washington Post. Here’s the home page for this stunning special report.
The Des Moines Register’s Brianne Pfannenstiel and Courtney Crowder with “The death of the Iowa Democratic caucus: How 50 years of jury-rigging doomed an American tradition.”
More resources for journalists
- Subscribe to PolitiFact’s weekly newsletter. Get facts delivered straight to your inbox.
- Hiring? Post jobs on The Media Job Board — Powered by Poynter, Editor & Publisher and America’s Newspapers.
- How Any Journalist Can Earn Trust (Self-directed course) — Enroll Now.
Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org.
The Poynter Report is our daily media newsletter. To have it delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, sign up here.
