Critics of ranked choice voting are using Democrat Mary Peltola’s win of Alaska’s House seat to distort the new method of casting votes. Peltola defeated two Republicans: Sarah Palin and Nick Begich III.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., tweeted Aug. 31, the day Peltola was named the winner, “60% of Alaska voters voted for a Republican, but thanks to a convoluted process and ballot exhaustion — which disenfranchises voters — a Democrat ‘won.’”
Cotton is free to dislike ranked choice voting — he isn’t the only critic. Supporters argue that ranked-choice voting eliminates extremist candidates; critics say it hasn’t lived up to its ideals.
But Cotton’s comments misinterpret how ranked choice voting works.
It would be more precise to say that in the first round, about 60% voted for one of two Republicans. In the first round, Republican Sarah Palin captured 31% of votes, and Republican Nick Begich III had 28%. Voting then went to a second round because no candidate received more than 50% of the vote in the first round.
“Peltola won fair and square by ranked choice voting rules,” said University of Alaska political scientist Jerry McBeath.
Alaska is using ranked choice voting to fill the seat left vacant by the death of U.S. Rep. Don Young. The election that Peltola won was a special election to serve out the remainder of Young’s term, which is only a few months. Another election in November between the same candidates will determine who holds the seat for a full two-year term.
Starting this year, ranked choice voting will also be used in other Alaska elections, including for the U.S. Senate seat held by Republican Lisa Murkowski.
We asked Cotton’s spokesperson for his evidence that the ranked choice system disenfranchised voters and she pointed to a 2020 op-ed by Cotton opposing the idea of Arkansas adopting ranked choice voting. Ultimately, a question about whether to adopt ranked choice voting didn’t make it to the ballot in Cotton’s home state of Arkansas.
How the Democrat won with ranked choice voting in Alaska
In a traditional election, either a primary or a general election, voters choose one candidate. But under ranked choice voting, the voters rank candidates in descending order of preference.
Communities of varying political stripes and geographic sizes, from cities in Utah to New York City, have used ranked choice voting. Alaska is the second state to implement it on a wide scale after Maine. Alaska voters approved ranked choice voting through a 2020 referendum.
Alaska’s model established an all-party primary in which four candidates would advance to a general election that would use ranked choice voting. In the June primary, the top vote-getters were Palin, Begich, Al Gross and Peltola. Gross then dropped out.
After the first round for the Aug. 16 election, Peltola was in first place with about 40% of the vote.
Begich was eliminated, and voting went to a second round.
Enough voters listed Peltola as either their first or second choice to ultimately give her about 51.47% of the vote, according to results that will be certified Sept. 2.
Therefore, Cotton’s comment that “60% of Alaska voters voted for a Republican” only applied to the first round of voting — which was not the final round — when that percentage voted for one of two Republicans.
If Alaska instead had held a traditional primary and Palin won more votes in a Republican primary than Begich (as she did in the first round of ranked choice voting), the results of Aug. 16 election suggest that Peltola would have won the general election faceoff even without ranked choice voting.
Why many Begich voters chose Peltola on the second round
Cotton said that “ballot exhaustion” occurred — a reference to when voters fail to rank enough candidates. There were about 11,000 exhausted ballots, or about 21% of the ballots on the second round.
It’s possible some voters didn’t understand that they could rank more than one candidate, even though officials and voter outreach groups publicized how to fill out the ballot. The Alaska Elections Division scheduled mock elections and posted concept ballots online. One group held an event at which audience members could rank drag queen performances.
But voters aren’t forced to rank more than one candidate.
Alaskans for Better Elections, a group that advocated for ranked choice voting, conducted exit surveys of voters and found that a majority found ranked choice voting simple. For those who ranked only one candidate, 75% said “that was the only candidate I liked.”
Palin said she ranked no candidates but herself.
“I do not believe in this system. It should not be embraced by enthusiastic participation when we know it’s not right,” she said.
Although some people may be surprised that more of the votes for Begich didn’t transfer to Palin, that ignores the context of Palin as a polarizing figure, said David Kimball, a University of Missouri political scientist.
Palin and Begich spent much of the campaign attacking each other, so it’s unsurprising that some of Begich’s supporters didn’t rank Palin second.
McBeath, the University of Alaska political scientist, said Alaskans voted against Palin for various reasons, including her not finishing her term as governor, her leaving the state after achieving national celebrity or because they found her too extreme or her views “too Trumpist.”
“Some supported Peltola because she projected herself as able to speak for all Alaskans and had done that in the state legislature, others because she was an Alaska native, others because her stances were moderate,” he said.
Cotton tweeted that Peltola “won” — a word he put in quote marks, which could mean he deemed her victory invalid. But ranked choice voting is a legal way to conduct elections, and it’s the law in Alaska.
“Alaska has settled on a very legitimate, perfectly safe and sane system to run their elections,” said Dan Shea, a government professor at Colby College.
The idea behind ranked choice voting is to give voters preferences, Shea said. He compared it to going to a food buffet.
“You don’t head back to the table with just one item, but instead lots of what you like. King crabs, to be sure! But then a few other choices that are just OK make the plate, too. The french fries. The items you really don’t like -— the spinach salad — never touch your plate. For many of the Begich voters, Palin never made the plate. Spinach salad. Pretty simple.”
Cotton also tweeted that the ranked choice voting system was a “scam to rig elections.” We rated a similar claim Pants on Fire. Cotton waited to reach that conclusion until the Democrat won.
“It is dangerous for democracy when politicians claim a rigged election when they happen to lose,” Kimball said.
Peltola, Palin and Begich will face each other again in November.
Republicans have a good shot at winning the full, two-year term if they do choose to “rank the red” then, said Rob Richie, president of FairVote, a Maryland-based nonprofit group that supports ranked choice voting.
Our ruling
Cotton tweeted “60% of Alaska voters voted for a Republican, but thanks to a convoluted process and ballot exhaustion — which disenfranchises voters — a Democrat ‘won.’”
Peltola achieved a legitimate win in a state in which the electorate approved ranked choice voting as the law. Peltola’s path to victory was aided by the two Republicans having attacked each other, and by Palin having a lot of critics.
Cotton arrived at the 60% figure by adding up the total votes the two Republicans, Palin and Begich, won in the all-candidate first round. There were about 11,000 voters who didn’t rank a second choice on their ballot, referred to as ballot exhaustion. But voters have that right and might have done so because they didn’t like a second candidate.
That voters could rank their choices doesn’t mean they were disenfranchised – a term that suggests citizens were blocked from voting.
We rate this statement Mostly False.
This fact check was originally published by PolitiFact, which is part of the Poynter Institute. It is republished here with permission. See the sources for this fact check here and more of their fact checks here.
