Dear Dr. Ink,
The Victoria’s Secret show is airing tonight on CBS. How do I know this? Because it’s the only thing that has been on the news for two days. They’ll show a clip and talk about it, show a clip and talk about the models, and then show a clip and talk about how people shouldn’t be talking about it. Fox just showed a clip and talked about shopping for Christmas. The clips are played before the end of every single commercial break.
Obviously this must be an important event because it is getting more airplay than anything else, but I can’t figure out what it has to do with “news.” I can’t even figure out what it has to do with fashion because I’ve never been anyplace where the women walk around in underwear and wings. Doc, am I wrong for wanting to know what’s going on with the apocalypse pre-show in the Middle East, or should I just be content with soft-core porn shorts on Fox?
Signed,
A news porn curmudgeon
Answer: This curmudgeon has apparently never heard of “sweeps,” “the November book,” the ratings period where the number of eyeballs on the screen has special impact on ad revenues and, hence, profit margins. That’s why the final episode of “The Bachelor” is being aired this week, and that’s why we’re being subjected to another Victoria’s Secret lingerie show.
Fox’s coverage of such events is a form of coat-tailing, hitching your news wagon to a popular show. Local news stations on after Oprah were once encouraged to look for similar Oprah-tunities. So if the TV talk diva focused on child abuse, for example, the news station might promote its local take on the subject. When “American Idol” was attracting millions of viewers for Fox, the Tampa affiliate promoted a local version of the competition on its news programs.
The puritanical side of Dr. Ink finds all such “news” decisions reprehensible. This judgment is not meant to imply that popular culture is not a legitimate source of news reporting. It makes sense to do a feature story on local white rappers the week that Eminem’s new movie “8 Mile” is coming out. Such coverage provides a window on the culture. But Doc resents the crass distortion of news values and bottom feeding at the heart of the Fox soft-core porn war.
It should be clear by now that soft-core is oozing its sleazy way onto network television in an ill-advised attempt to keep up with the devolving standards of cable. For proof, we need look no further than the opening scenes of last night’s “NYPD Blue,” in which the squad captain and his ex share an early morning Clinton-Lewinsky moment in the interrogation room.
Uncategorized
Eyes on the Nudes
Tags: Ask Dr. Ink, Writing
More News
Opinion | Two newsrooms stand out in their coverage of the nightmarish Los Angeles wildfires
The Los Angeles Times and CNN are providing especially notable coverage of ‘the most destructive firestorms to hit the region in memory’
January 9, 2025
Opinion | How journalism needs to adapt to the rise of news influencers
Journalists should explore ways to mimic influencers’ strategies to engage audiences — and bring their foundational skills with them
January 9, 2025
Opinion | With Trump on his way back to the White House, Meta drops its fact-checking program
Mark Zuckerberg can preach all he wants about censorship and free speech, but it’s easy to see through his words. This was done to appease Trump.
January 8, 2025
Why more and more journalists are launching worker-owned outlets
Fed up with the media industry’s instability, workers are starting newsrooms where they can govern themselves and reach readers directly
January 8, 2025
Does crowdsourced fact-checking work? Experts are skeptical of Meta’s plan
CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Meta will adopt a Community Notes model similar to X, where fact-checkers say misinformation often goes unchecked
January 7, 2025