Center for American Progress
The Los Angeles Times won an IRE Philip Meyer Award for publishing teachers’ individual performance scores in 2010, but the Center for American Progress says that’s counterproductive. It says the Times “maximized the controversy—and perhaps the number of hits it drew to Web pages with advertising” by publishing teachers’ names. Publicizing individual scores just causes parents to try to move their children out of certain classrooms rather than spurring broader reform, the organization argues. “Any public association between teachers’ names and their value-added estimates will create a kind of vicious circle. Instead of tethering performance evaluation for current teachers to the goal of improving students’ academic achievement, value-added estimates will help preserve the status quo.” A court battle has been under way over a similar disclosure for New York City teachers. || Related: Parents ask LAT to remove teacher’s rating after he commits suicide (Poynter.org)
Uncategorized
Education think tank urges media not to publish teachers’ names with performance scores
More News
The repeal of the fairness doctrine accelerated the polarization of US media
When broadcasters no longer had to present diverse viewpoints, conservative radio thrived
April 22, 2025
Opinion | Pete Hegseth’s latest excuse is much of the same: It’s the media’s fault
After leaking military strike details — twice now — the defense secretary attacked journalists instead of taking responsibility
April 22, 2025
Opinion | Donald Trump’s war with The Associated Press rages on
A court told Trump to let the AP back in. The White House found a workaround.
April 21, 2025
Q&A: A daughter tells her Native mother’s story — and a larger American one
In ‘Medicine River,’ journalist Mary Annette Pember confronts the legacy of boarding schools and the trauma passed down through generations
April 21, 2025
Opinion | Fact-checkers are out. The internet gets to vote on the truth now.
As TikTok joins X and Meta in crowdsourcing fact-checks, here’s what could go right — and very wrong
April 18, 2025
Comments are closed.
Comments