Today’s news had me digging into the Romenesko archives for the 2003 stories about Los Angeles Times readers canceling the paper over stories about Arnold Schwarzenegger‘s behavior with women. John Carroll, who was then Times editor, said that “In the long run, I believe this will strengthen the paper’s relationship with the readers” because they’ll respect the paper’s commitment to the truth. Press critic Dan Kennedy wrote that “it should go without saying that the Los Angeles Times did what it was supposed to do.” || The New York Observer said at the time that the Wall Street Journal should be ashamed of itself for minimizing groping allegations against Schwarzenegger. “Sounding like a bunch of 1950’s-era martini-guzzlers, the editors of The Journal gave Mr. Schwarzenegger a figurative big slap on the back and rewarded him because he did not ‘deny, dissemble or wag his finger into a camera and drop a whopper.'”
Uncategorized
Remember when Schwarzenegger supporters canceled LAT subscriptions over groping stories?
More News
2025 Poynter Journalism Prizes now open for entries until Feb. 14
The contest, which honors distinguished reporting and writing, accepts entries from US-based news outlets
January 6, 2025
Opinion | The new year looks the same as last year at The Washington Post
The Post again faces uncomfortable controversy, this time with a Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist quitting in protest
January 6, 2025
How a Fox News report fueled false claims about the New Orleans suspect. He was a US citizen.
Shamsud-Din Jabbar, the 42-year-old suspected driver in the New Year’s truck attack in New Orleans, was a US citizen and US Army veteran
January 6, 2025
‘No comment’: When it’s time to make that the story
What an independent journalist and a student newspaper can teach journalists about sources who block them
January 3, 2025
Here’s what Poynter looked like 50 years ago
Orange walls. TVs with bunny ears. Light tables. And so much carpet …
January 2, 2025
Comments are closed.
Comments